Huh, I just received a jury duty summons.  I really have only two choices.  Do it, or don’t.  Being over 65 years of age, should I choose, I can be exempt from duty.  There are other exceptions, but none that would apply to me, unless you consider me mentally or physically disabled.

For purposes of discussion, what would you do?   The form says to respond immediately.  As mentioned above, I would be exempt, should I choose, because I’m over 65.  It’s for a possible seven day civil trial October 28th.  I’ll let you know my decision after the discussion.

   I've been called to jury duty 1/2 dozen times in the last 30 years. Work/job reasons, i was always able to excuse myself from duty. Now that I'm sub 65 and not physically working, i would actually find it kind of interesting to be on jury duty.
 Then again, I'd probably be disqualified once the judge asked me a few questions. it would be a definite PITA to get there however, pay $20 a day parking, or take transit to New West court.

I don't think the judge asks questions.  But the lawyers for both sides will.

I've been called twice in the past and I went to serve both times.  This was in Timmins back in the 2000's.  The process there was maybe a little different.  A whack of people get called and then they draw names from a drum....kind of like a bingo ball drum.  Those names are called to the front to be questioned by the lawyers for one of several scheduled cases.  If you get called and are rejected your name goes back in the drum to be eligible for the next scheduled trial. 

I wound up on a civil jury but they settled the case just before trial.  I thought the process was a huge learning experience and would definitely serve if called again.  But it's entirely up to you Ross.  You need to think about whether you can sit comfortably for long periods without falling asleep.   

Set aside the issue of sentencing.  My feeling is, same as voting, it’s my obligation as a Canadian and British Columbian, to serve the courts when asked.  Fortunately for me, it won’t be a financial burden, or really even a great inconvenience.  I’ll respond in the affirmative.  In all likelihood the case will be resolved before it goes to court.

I also feel it’s my obligation to vote.  I’ve voted in every national, provincial, and municipal election where I’ve lived since I turned 18 in 1975.

   I believe if the case goes to court, there is a minor monetary payment system.


  As for voting, I agree that voting is a very important part of democracy. In fact if you do not vote, you should be ignored in society if you bitch, about anything.

   I'm of the opinion that you should wear responsibility for the platform you voted for, financially,,,,,but its impossible to mandate that and still retain one's right to voting privacy. I can only hope that those responsible for voting in damaging 'platforms' wear some personal guilt in their lapse of judgement.

Yes, there is a very small stipend and this is effectively supporting our democracy. Must point out that the four times I showed up I was rejected by the defence attorneys as I was classed as an opinionated, privileged , white man ( not my words ) and excused immediately. I guess the y did not like me but to be fair I have been screwed through multiple divorces and have no appreciation for any lawyer. Shakespeare had it right

Frank

   If the personnel responsible for jury selection pulled the race card involving my race as a means of elimination from jury duty, I'd ask for that on paper, and take it to the news, and keep it for future reference for future jury duty call.